Did the People Resurrected in Matthew 27 Die Again

Yous know about how individuals proceeds control of the ability of the Country and so abuse that power similar onetime Usa President George "Dubya" Bush?  "Dubya" started a state of war in Iraq which was highly profitable for some US businesses.  He accomplished this b y claiming Republic of iraq had a nuclear weapons plan which was a serious globe security threat when Iraq did non and when it had already been bombed into oblivion by the war his Dad George Bush Snr waged on Iraq in 1992: Valerie Plame Wilson: the housewife CIA spy who was 'fair game' for Bush UK The Telegraph Past Chrissy Iley xv Feb 2011.

Call up how Bush-league was supported by United kingdom of great britain and northern ireland Premier Tony Blair who helped by persuading the British Parliament to join the Us with faked "intelligence" of Iraq's weapons of mass destruction which did not exist merely which Blair claimed could be deployed within twoscore minutes and posed a serious security threat?

If you remember that then you will know how these kinds of people manipulate the media.  Observe how they persuade us nosotros are in imminent danger of some threat or other and that they tin relieve the states all if we trust them?

This trickery is not new.  Information technology had been used for well over a century with smallpox.  The myth continues to this 24-hour interval.

On CHS we wrote previously about how unscientific the claim is that smallpox was eradicated past vaccination when that frankly is nonsense scientifically.  The demise of the illness came most as a result of the interaction of three completely different factors: isolation, attenuation and improved living weather, particularly nutrition and sanitation. The effect cannot be attributable to the smallpox vaccine – any vaccine which takes over 100 years to work ipso facto proves itself not to accept:

Small Pox – Big Lie – Bioterrorism Implications of Flawed Theories of Eradication

There was a nasty disease called smallpox and it did impale people long ago.

This was particularly the instance when the poor moved to the cities during the industrial revolution looking for work and choked them in overcrowded unsanitary slums ripe for convenance and spreading disease: London'south beginning park built after rich feared disease spread from slums Britain The Independent By Andy McSmith Friday 07 Nov 2008; Hygiene History in the Industrialized Globe.

The middle and upper classes needed to exist reassured the State would keep them safe from the threat of disease.  The majority of the population of entire countries were persuaded their States could attain this by ensuring the then truly "bully unwashed" masses would exist vaccinated and the illness controlled.  The trouble was this was a myth simply the people wanted to believe and were persuaded.

Smallpox vaccination did not piece of work and sometimes killed as many or more than the illness itself whilst many of the "vaccinated" all the same contracted the disease: Smallpox Bloodshed, Great britain, Us, Sweden.

At present you tin read a relatively brusque simply well-referenced history of the myth of vaccination and the myth of its part in the eradication of smallpox:

Online Version – Vaccination: A Mythical History ~ by Roman Bystrianyk and Suzanne Humphries Dr. – Baronial 27, 2013

SMALLPOX MORTALITY- UK, Usa & SWEDEN

In the graphs beneath find the large numbers of deaths caused by the smallpox vaccine itself.  By 1901 in the U.k., more people died from the smallpox vaccination than from smallpox itself.  The severity of the affliction dimished with improved living standards and was non vanquished past vaccination, as the medical "consensus" view tells us. Any vaccine which takes 100 years to "work" did not.  On whatever scientific analysis of the history and information, crediting smallpox vaccine for the turn down in smallpox appears misplaced.

When during 1880-1908 the City of Leicester in England stopped vaccination compared to the remainder of the UK and elsewhere, its survival rates soared and smallpox death rates plummeted [see table below].  Leicester's approach also cost far less.

[Click Graph to Overstate – Opens In New Window]

[Click Graph to Enlarge – Opens In New Window]

Extracts from "LEICESTER: Sanitation versus Vaccination" By J.T. Biggs J.P.

[Download Entire Volume as .pdf 43 Mb  – Or Read Online]

TABLE 21

SMALLPOX FATALITY RATES, cases in vaccinated and re-vaccinated populations compared with "unprotected" Leicester – 1860 to 1908.

Proper name.	Period.	Modest-Pox.  Cases	Modest-Pox. Deaths.	Fatality-charge per unit per cent. of Cases
Japan	1886-1908	288,779	77,415	26.8
British Ground forces (United kingdom)	1860-1908	one,355	96	7.1
British Ground forces (India)	1860-1908	2,753	307	11.i
British Ground forces (Colonies)	1860-1908	934	82	eight.8
Regal Navy	1860-1908	2,909	234	8.0
Grand Totals and case fatality rate per cent, over all		296,730	78,134	26.3
Leicester (since giving up vaccination)	1880-1908	1,206	61	5.1

Biggs said "In this comparison, I have given the numbers of revaccinated cases, and deaths, and each fatality-rate separately and together, and then that they may be compared either way with Leicester. In pro-vaccinist language, may I ask, if the excessive pocket-sized-pox fatality of Japan, of the British Regular army, and of the Imperial Navy, are non due to vaccination and revaccination, to what are they due? It would beget an interesting psychical report were nosotros able to know to what heights of eloquent glorification Sir George Buchanan would take soared with a corresponding result—merely on the reverse side."

Tabular array 29.

Modest-Pox Epidemics, Cost, and Fatality Rates Compared

	Vaccinal Condition	Small-Pox Cases	Small-Pox Deaths	Fatality-charge per unit Per Cent	Cost of Epidemic
London 1900-02	Well Vaccinated	nine,659	one,594	16.50	£492,000
Glasgow 1900-02	Well Vaccinated	iii,417	377	eleven.03	£ 150,000
Sheffield 1887-88	Well Vaccinated	7,066	688	nine.73	£32,257
Leicester 1892-94	Practically Unvaccinated	393	21	5.34	£2,888
Leicester 1902-04	Practically Unvaccinated	731	30	4.x	£i,602

[Click Graph to Enlarge – Opens In New Window]

[Click Graph to Overstate – Opens In New Window]

[Click Graph to Overstate – Opens In New Window]

__________________________________________

Vaccination: A Mythical History ~ past Roman Bystrianyk and Suzanne Humphries Physician

– Baronial 27, 2013

With the approaching flu season and the enthusiastic calls to employ the flu vaccine, you might exist wondering where the idea of vaccination got its start. Where did the thought of injecting whole or bits of microbes and other substances into people in an attempt to provide protection against contagious illness brainstorm?

Many medical and history books nowadays a simple tale of the origin of vaccination. Virtually present the same basic tale of the brilliant observation of a uncomplicated country doctor and his courage in attempting to thwart a deadly and frightening disease of that time – smallpox, or as it was often called the speckled monster. In a recent and popular book, The Panic Virus, the author reiterates this classic tale.

In 1796, Jenner enlisted a milkmaid named Sarah Nelmes and an viii-year old boy named James Phipps to exam his theory. Jenner transferred pus from Nelmes's cowpox blisters onto incisions he'd fabricated in Phipps'south hands. The boy came down with a slight fever, merely goose egg more. Later on, Jenner gave Phipps a standard smallpox inoculation – which should accept resulted in a full-blown, albeit mild, case of the illness. Nothing happened. Jenner tried inoculating Phipps with smallpox again; again, zip. [1]

Edward Jenner's idea eventually became known every bit vaccination, which is derived from the Latin word for cow – vacca. It was originally referred to every bit cowpoxing, simply eventually the term vaccination was adopted. As the story goes, with this invention in place, smallpox would be tamed and the world would be freed from the terror of the disease.

Such is the stuff of legends. The story is not unlike the classic Greek legends of Theseus defeating the kid-devouring Minotaur, or Perseus beheading the mortiferous snake-headed Medusa, or many other classic stories of the brave hero defeating a mortiferous enemy. The Jenner fable has been reduced to a unproblematic and memorable story of a hero defeating the deadly enemy, smallpox. Authors claim that with vaccination in place, "billions of lives" have been saved.[2]

Merely legendary heroes, specially those that are used to support a belief, achieve an iconic status while any unsavory aspects about the hero and the story are ignored or forgotten. Mythical tales are designed to evoke a positive emotional response to influence societal thinking.

The tale of defeating smallpox begins well before the story of our hero. It begins with the concept of using small amounts of smallpox pus and scratching information technology into the arms of healthy people. This thought was introduced to the Western world by Lady Mary Wortley Montagu in 1717. She had returned from the Ottoman Empire with knowledge of the practice of inoculation confronting smallpox, known as variolation. This type of inoculation was simply a thing of infecting a person with smallpox at a time and in a setting of his choosing. The thought behind inoculation was that, in a controlled setting, people would do better against the affliction than if they contracted it at some perchance less desirable time and place in the time to come.

The thought was embraced by the medical profession and enthusiastically practiced. Merely because of the complexity and danger involved, inoculation remained an performance that could only be afforded by the wealthy.[three] The procedure did often assistance protect the individual that was inoculated, merely there was still an estimated 2-v% that died as a result.[4,five] Still, this was an comeback compared to a 20-25% mortality rate in those that had naturally contracted smallpox during an epidemic.[vi] Simply, was the departure in mortality due to inoculation alone? Or could information technology have had something to do with the fact that the wealthy had better admission to more nutritious food and a cleaner surroundings than the majority of lodge?

There was one major and by and large unacknowledged drawback to variolation – those inoculated could and did spread smallpox creating more deaths than at that place would have been naturally. In a 1764 article the writer recognized that smallpox was a contagious disease and that the practise of variolation would create new vectors to spread it. He compared the smallpox deaths in the 38 years before the introduction of variolation to the 38 years after, and found that smallpox deaths had increased⎯not decreased. He was forced to conclude that variolation on the whole, led to worse problems, because it caused more deaths than lives saved.

Information technology is incontestably like the plague a contagious illness, what tends to terminate the progress of the infection tends to lessen the danger that attends it; what tends to spread the contagion, tends to increment that danger; the exercise of Inoculation manifestly tends to spread the contagion, for a contagious disease is produced by Inoculation where information technology would not otherwise have been produced; the place where information technology is thus produced becomes a center of contagion, whence information technology spreads not less fatally or widely than it would spread from a middle where the disease should happen in a natural mode; these centers of contamination are plain multiplied very greatly by Inoculation . . .[7]

All the same, while the popularity of variolation varied, the problem of it spreading smallpox, was largely unrecognized. Because variolation had become a very lucrative procedure it was enthusiastically continued by most of the medical profession through the 1700s and into the early 1800s. Smallpox continued to be spread by this medically-sanctioned procedure.

Now enters the hero of our fable. It was rumored amongst milkmaids that infection with cowpox would protect i from smallpox. In 1796, believing these stories, Edward Jenner performed an experiment on an viii-year-old boy named James Phipps. He took illness affair that he believed to exist cowpox from lesions on a dairymaid, Sarah Nelmes, and vaccinated James Phipps with information technology. He later deliberately exposed the kid to smallpox equally a exam to see if he was protected by the cowpox inoculation. When the boy did not contract clinical smallpox, it was assumed that the technique of vaccination was successful.

In 1798 Jenner published his results claiming lifelong protection against smallpox using his discovery with but rumors to back up his contention. While he promoted the use of his technique based on the tale that someone infected with cowpox would be immune to smallpox, there were doctors of the fourth dimension who challenged this myth, because they had seen smallpox follow cowpox. At a meeting of the Medico-Convivial Society, Jenner was ridiculed over his practise.

But he [Jenner] no sooner mentioned it than they laughed at it. The cow doctors could have told him of hundreds of cases where minor-pox had followed cow-pox . . . [8]

From the beginning there were problems with Jenner'southward procedure. In 1799, Mr. Drake vaccinated a number of children with cowpox matter obtained from Edward Jenner. The children were so tested by existence inoculated with smallpox to meet if the cowpox procedure had been effective. All of them developed smallpox, and vaccination failed to protect any of them. Jenner received the report just decided to ignore the results considering they were non in back up of his theory.[ix]

Vaccination was quickly embraced by many in the medical profession every bit the answer to combating smallpox. Past 1801, an estimated 100,000 people had already been vaccinated in England with the belief that the process would produce lifelong protection. The medical community continued to cover Jenner'due south ideas amidst numerous accounts that refuted the theory of vaccination. Early reports indicated that there were cases of people who had cowpox, or were vaccinated, and were nonetheless dying of smallpox. Specific cases of cowpox and vaccine failure were reported in the 1809 Medical Observer.

A Child was vaccinated by Mr. Robinson, surgeon and apothecary, at Rotherham, towards the end of the year 1799. A month later it was inoculated with small-scale-pox matter without effect, and a few months later took confluent modest-pox and died. ii. A adult female-retainer to Mr. Take chances, of Bungay, in Suffolk, had cow-pox in the coincidental way from milking. Seven years later she became nurse to Yarmouth Hospital, where she caught small-pox, and died. three and 4. Elizabeth and John Nicholson, 3 years of historic period, were vaccinated at Battersea in the summer of 1804. Both contracted modest-pox in May, 1805 and died . . . 13. The child of Mr. R died of small-scale-pox in Oct 1805. The patient had been vaccinated, and the parents were bodacious of its security. The vaccinator'due south name was concealed. fourteen. The child of Mr. Hindsley at Mr. Adam's part . . . died of small-pox a year after vaccination.[10]

Reports through the early 1800s began to accrue showing vaccination was not living upward to its hope to protect from smallpox. A report in 1810 from the Medical Observer noted 535 cases of small-pox after vaccination, 97 fatal cases, and 150 cases of vaccine injuries.[eleven] Note that 97 deaths out of 535 cases is an 18% fatality rate and is substantially the aforementioned fatality rate equally smallpox before vaccination was introduced. This high fatality rate along with 150 vaccine-related injuries was a direct challenge to this new and highly lauded medical procedure.

Another article in 1817 reflected the reality of vaccination failure.

. . . the number of all ranks suffering under Small Pox, who have previously undergone Vaccination by the about expert practitioners, is at present alarmingly great.[12]

In 1818 Thomas Brown, a surgeon with 30 years of feel in Musselburgh, Scotland, published an commodity discussing his experience with vaccination. He stated that he was originally extremely positive in promoting vaccination and that no i in the medical profession "could outstrip me in zeal for promoting vaccine practice." But after vaccinating 1,200 persons, he became disappointed in the hope of vaccination. His feel was that, after vaccination, people however could contract and fifty-fifty die from smallpox, and that he could no longer support the practise.[13]

Like today, surgeons and doctors of the time were handsomely compensated for performing vaccination and thus had a tendency to embrace it every bit a new class of income. It is therefore quite significant for a doctor to have spoken out against it as Dr. Brownish did.

Continued observations showed that smallpox could still infect those who previously had smallpox and that those who were vaccinated could also be infected.

. . . during the years 1820, 1, and, 2 [1820-1822] there was a keen hubbub near the pocket-sized-pox. It broke out with the great epidemic to the north . . . It pressed close to home to Dr. Jenner himself . . . It attacked many who had had pocket-size-pox before, and often severely; almost to death; and of those who had been vaccinated, it left some alone, only fell upon nifty numbers.[14]

William Cobbett was a farmer, announcer, and English pamphleteer. In 1829 he wrote about the failure of vaccination to protect people from smallpox. Cobbett considered vaccination to be an unproven and fraudulent medical do. He noted that:

. . . hundreds of instances, persons cow-poxed by JENNER HIMSELF, have taken the existent small-pox later on, and have either died from the disorder, or narrowly escaped with their lives![15]

During this fourth dimension vaccine material was the "humanized" form, which meant that material was taken from the arm of a previously vaccinated person to vaccinate the next person. Arm-to-arm vaccination continued for decades, only as failures increased there was a belief that the vaccine had lost its original supposed dominance, and at that place were calls to obtain fresh cloth directly from cows.[16]

While the fable maintained that the vaccine material came from cows, Jenner actually believed the textile originated from an infectious condition of horses called the "grease." From this and other behavior, there were many attempts to recreate an original cow-based vaccine. All these attempts failed.[17] Some believed that cowpox was merely smallpox that was passed through cows and somehow made into a new disease.[18] This faulty belief would event in the creation of more than smallpox epidemics.

In 1836 in Attenborough, Massachusetts, Dr. John C. Martin took fluid from the pock of a man who died from smallpox and inoculated it onto a cow's udder. He then took pus from that cow and used it to vaccinate people. A large smallpox epidemic ensued causing panic and sickness in many people over the subsequent months.[xix] A later inquiry determined that this was nothing more than the old practice of smallpox inoculation.[xx]

Not only was vaccination failing and causing smallpox epidemics, but there were likewise reports of deaths from other causes soon subsequently vaccination. For example, a skin status called erysipelas was a particularly prolonged and painful way to die.

. . . a boy from Somers-town, aged five years, "modest-pox confluent, unmodified (9 days)." He had been vaccinated at the age of 4 months; one cicatrix . . . the wife of a labourer, from Lambeth, aged 22 years, "small-pox confluent, unmodified (eight days)." Vaccinated in infancy in Suffolk; two good cicatrices . . . the son of a mariner, anile x weeks, and the son of a sugar baker, aged 13 weeks, died of "general erysipelas after vaccination, effusion of the brain."[21]

Because arm-to-arm vaccination was existence used, other diseases could be spread causing various epidemics. Infectious diseases attributed to vaccination included tuberculosis and syphilis. In 1863 Dr. Ricord spoke before the University at Paris.

First I rejected the idea that syphilis could be transplanted by vaccination. But facts accumulated more than and more, and now I must concede the possibility of the transfer of syphilis by means of the vaccine. I exercise this very reluctantly. At present I practice non hesitate longer to acknowledge and proclaim the reality of the fact.[22]

Equally it became increasingly clear throughout the 1800s to more doctors and citizens that vaccination was not what it was promised to be, refusals increased. In guild to deal with this, the judicial system intervened. In 1855, Massachusetts created a ready of comprehensive laws providing for widespread vaccination.[23]

These laws and compulsory vaccination did zero to curb the problem of smallpox. Data from Boston that begins in 1811 shows that, starting around 1837, there were periodic smallpox epidemics that culminated in the bully 1872 epidemic. Later on 1855, there were further smallpox epidemics in 1859-60, 1864-65, and 1867 and the infamous epidemic in 1872-73. This was the most severe smallpox epidemic since the introduction of vaccination.[24] These repeat smallpox epidemics showed that the strict vaccination laws instituted by Massachusetts in 1855 had no effect at all (Graph ane). In fact, more people died in the 20 years after the strict Massachusetts vaccination compulsory laws than in the 20 years earlier.

Graph 1: Boston smallpox bloodshed rate from 1841 to 1880.

Past this point, the medical profession no longer claimed lifelong protection against smallpox from a single vaccination. Instead, claims were made that vaccination made smallpox less likely to kill or that smallpox would be milder. Calls were and so fabricated for revaccination. Claims were made that revaccination had to be performed anywhere from yearly to every 10 years.[25]

While the majority of the medical profession supported vaccination, there were those that spoke out against the process. Dr. Longstaffe, a prominent physician of Edinburgh England noted that huge profits were being fabricated past vaccinators. Immense financial proceeds combined with the forcefulness of law created the perfect environment that would impose vaccination upon the citizens of the Western globe.

The public vaccinators have received immense sums from Parliament . . . In 1850 alone they amounted to £54,727, and in the present year they will get nearly a quarter million. Other sums, also, which I cannot proper name, accept been granted for the purpose of sustaining this monstrous fraud. Has ever a dishonest remedy produced and then much gain?

[26]

In England, governmental command strengthened over the years, with progressively stricter laws designed to enforce vaccination. Laws previously passed in 1840 and 1853 were consolidated into oppressive compulsory laws in 1867 that included fines for parents who did not vaccinate their children. Still, through the 1800s, periodic smallpox epidemics continued to occur. A great pandemic struck in 1872 and took the lives of thousands, even those who were vaccinated.

Every recruit that enters the French army is vaccinated. During the Franco-Prussian war there were twenty-three thousand 4 hundred and sixty-nine cases of pocket-sized-pox in that army. The London Lancet of July 15, 1871 said:

Of nine thousand 3 hundred and 90-two small-pox patients in London hospitals, six one thousand viii hundred and fifty-4 had been vaccinated. Seventeen and one-half per cent of those attacked died. In the whole land more than than one hundred and xx-two thou vaccinated persons have suffered from modest-pox . . . Official returns from Germany show that between 1870 and 1885 one million vaccinated persons died from pocket-sized-pox.[27]

Concerns over vaccine safety, effectiveness, and governmental infringement on personal liberty and freedom through compulsory vaccination stoked the fires of the anti-vaccine motility. People began to resist the government and chose to pay fines. Some even accepted imprisonment rather than assuasive vaccination for themselves or their children. The public backfire culminated in the great demonstration in Leicester England, in 1885. That same year Leicester's authorities, which had pushed for vaccination through the use of fines and jail time, was replaced with a new regime that was opposed to compulsory vaccination. By 1887, the vaccination coverage rates had dropped to 10%.[28]

Instead of relying on vaccination, people began to rely on proper sanitation, quarantine of smallpox patients and thorough disinfection of their homes. They believed this technique was a cheap and effective ways that eliminated the need for vaccination. However, there were dire predictions from the majority of the medical community that strongly endorsed vaccination and believed the depression vaccination charge per unit would issue in a terrible "massacre," especially in the "unprotected" children.[29]

Despite such prophesies of doom from the medical profession, the majority of the town'southward residents were steadfast in their belief that vaccination was not necessary to control smallpox. The prophecy that the Leicester residents would somewhen exist plagued with disaster never did come to laissez passer. Low vaccination rates resulted in lower smallpox rates and deaths, than in well-vaccinated towns.[30] In fact, the lower vaccination rates correlated to an overall subtract in smallpox deaths (Graph ii). Leicester showed that by abandoning vaccination in favor of what became termed as the "Leicester Method," deaths from smallpox were far lower than when vaccination rates were high.

The experience of unvaccinated Leicester is an eye-opener to the people and an centre-sore to the pro-vaccinists the world over. Here is a smashing manufacturing town having a population of nearly a quarter of a million, which has demonstrated past a crucial test of an experience extending over a menstruum of more than than a quarter of a century, that an unvaccinated population has been far less susceptible to pocket-size-pox and far less afflicted by that disease since it abandoned vaccination than it was at a time when ninety-five per cent of its births were vaccinated and its adult population well re-vaccinated.[31]

While vaccination was frequently promoted every bit a safety procedure, it often acquired sickness or even death. From 1859 to 1922 official deaths related to vaccination were more than ane,600 in England (Graph 3). In fact, from 1906 to 1922 the number of deaths recorded from smallpox vaccination and smallpox were approximately the same (Graph 4).

Graph 2: Leicester England smallpox mortality rate vs. vaccination coverage from 1838 to 1910.

Graph iii: England and Wales total deaths from cowpox and other effects of vaccination from 1859 to 1922.

Graph 4: England and Wales smallpox deaths vs. vaccination deaths from 1906 to 1922

At the end of the 1800s, smallpox inverse its character. Later the summer of 1897, the severe type of smallpox with its high expiry rate, with rare exception, had entirely disappeared from the United States. Smallpox turned from a illness that killed 1 in 5 of its victims to i that only killed anywhere from 1 in 50 and later to as low as i in 380. The disease could still impale, but having get so much milder, it was frequently mistaken for various other pox infections or skin eruptions.

During 1896 a very mild type of smallpox began to prevail in the South and later gradually spread over the state. The mortality was very low and it [smallpox] was usually at kickoff mistaken for chicken pox. . .[32]

The author of a 1913 article in The Journal of Infectious Diseases presented a table showing that in 1895 and 1896 the smallpox death rate was around xx%, as information technology had been historically. The table also showed that after 1896 the death rate fell off quickly, starting with 6% in 1897 to every bit depression as 0.26% past 1908. As the balmy form of smallpox replaced the classic type, smallpox could be difficult to tell from chickenpox, which was, by this time, considered a mild disease of childhood.

. . . chickenpox, is a modest communicable illness of childhood, and is chiefly important because it frequently gives ascent to difficulty in diagnosis in cases of mild smallpox. Smallpox and chickenpox are sometimes very difficult to differentiate clinically.[33]

By the 1920s it was recognized that the new form of smallpox produced niggling in the way of symptoms, even though few had been vaccinated.

Private cases, or even epidemics, occur in which, although there has been no protection by vaccination, the course of the illness is extremely mild. The lesions are few in number or entirely absent-minded, and the constitutional symptoms mild or insignificant.[34]

Despite this extremely low vaccine coverage rate, there was never a resurgence of smallpox. Even though smallpox was non a major upshot, the practice of smallpox vaccination continued from the time of the last smallpox death in the United States in 1948 upwards until 1963. This resulted in an estimated v,000 unnecessary vaccine-related hospitalizations from generalized rash, secondary infections, and encephalitis.

A 1958 study detailed the cases of 9 children in which 2 died of a pare condition due to vaccination, now existence termed eczema vaccinatum. The occurrence of this disease was estimated by the authors to be between one in 20,000 to 1 in 100,000 with a fatality rate of four to xl%.[35] However, they best-selling that well-nigh cases were not reported and there was no accurate accounting on this upshot of vaccination. At that place were also an estimated 200 to 300 deaths as the result of smallpox vaccination, while during the same time there had only been one smallpox death in 1948.[36]

The last smallpox death in the Usa following an importation occurred in 1948, but since that time there have been probably 200 to 300 deaths from smallpox vaccination.[37]

Eczema vaccinatum is however occurring today, as recently noted in the news. A toddler was infected by his war machine father after the father was vaccinated. Afterwards a prolonged access, and a week of experimental treatments including immune globulin from donor blood and antiviral medication, the toddler recovered. The mother also required handling and virus was found all over the firm.[38]

Because of poor surveillance and vaccine reaction underreporting, the authors of a 1970 report idea that the number of smallpox vaccine-related deaths could actually have been even college. This study only examined deaths from 1959 to 1968 in the U.s.a.. If the deaths were this high in a country with a mod health-care organisation, what was the full number of deaths from smallpox vaccination from 1800 to the present beyond the unabridged earth?

There were those in the medical community who were relieved that the failure of compulsory vaccination never gained much public scrutiny. Instead, the focus was shifted to new types of vaccinations.

Compulsory vaccination which once had the suffrage of the nation has now inappreciably a serious supporter. We are ashamed to jettison the idea completely and perchance afraid that if we did the accident of some futurity epidemic might put united states in the wrong. We adopt to permit compulsory vaccination die a natural death and are relieved that the full general public is non curious enough to demand an inquest. In the meantime our attention is diverted to other and newer forms of immunisation.[39]

During this fourth dimension with vaccination every bit almost the only medically promoted manner to deal with disease, there were doctors finding amazing successes with smallpox using other methods. Vinegar is a mutual food production that is fabricated through fermentation of a variety of sources. An 1877 article described the success that Dr. Roth had using vinegar for smallpox prophylaxis.

D. G. Oliphant, K.D., of Toronto, Canada, having read the article on the utilize of Acetic acid in scarlet fever, writes of a "vinegar cure" as practical to pocket-sized pox. Dr. Roth first claimed wonderful success in handling regarding vinegar more reliable as a prophylactic in small-scale-pox than Belladonna in red fever. Dr. Roth gave both to the sick and to the exposed two tabular array-spoonfuls of vinegar, after breakfast and at evening, for xiv days. Few persons thus treated took the illness at all. None who adopted the prophylactic treatment died, while amidst those under ordinary treatment the mortality was as usual.[40]

In 1899 Dr. Howe also demonstrated vinegar's ability to protect a person from acquiring smallpox. Those who used the vinegar protocol were able to take intendance of other people with smallpox without fear of contracting the disease. The author notes that despite several hundred exposures, vinegar was protective confronting smallpox and was considered an "established fact."[41]

Again, in 1901 professor MacLean promoted the thought of vinegar as a existent preventative of smallpox. Dr. MacLean claimed that apple cider vinegar and no other blazon of vinegar should exist used three or four times a day to protect a person from contracting smallpox.

J.P. MacLean Ph. D., the renowned "anti" Secretary of the Western Reserve Historical Society, having readily overthrown the conclusions of all the neat men who for a century past have been convinced of the efficacy of vaccination for the prevention of smallpox, at present comes to the front in the newspapers with the real preventative. "Any person who has been exposed demand take no fright of smallpox if he will take two or three tablespoonfuls of pure cider vinegar three or four times a day." The discussion may at present be regarded as closed, and smallpox at last is conquered![42]

Apple cider vinegar might seem lightheaded, but only considering nearly people have been conditioned to accept the historic period-old prophylaxis for smallpox: raw, disease-laden, contaminated pus scrapings from an infected animal's (normally a cow) abdomen, diluted in glycerin, and scratched into the human arm with a metal prong until the arm was raw and bleeding. What seems sillier now?

Scurvy is a illness that results from a deficiency of vitamin C due to starvation or just an extremely poor or unbalanced diet. Vitamin C is essential for the formation of salubrious collagen. Collagen is the protein that forms connective tissue in peel, basic, and blood vessels and too gives back up to internal organs. In scurvy, the body is not able to generate adequate collagen or extracellular matrix proteins that serve as mortar holding cells together and, as a result, literally comes unglued and falls apart.

William A. Guy, dean of the Medical Department of King'due south College, described the poor diet of gilded miners in California in the 1850s. Thousands of miners subsisted on meat, fatty, java, and booze while working long, hard days nether the unrelenting California sun. The vitamin C-deficient diet led many to develop scurvy.

Scurvy has been very prevalent amid the gold miners of California . . . the emigrants upon the overland journeys and at the mines, as living almost entirely upon fried salary or fatty pork and flour made into batter-cakes, and fried in the fat, which completely saturates it. This is done down with copious librations of strong java, and large quantities of brandy or whiskey are taken in the intervals of the meals . . . this has been the diet of thousands for months, under a scorching sunday, when the temperature was over a hundred in the shade, the men being at the same time subjected to the virtually intense labour.[43]

Although many died of cholera during the California Gilt Blitz of the mid-1800s, an estimated 10,000 men died from scurvy.

During the American Civil State of war twice as many died from nutritional deficiency related diseases as those killed in battle.[44] For instance, the causes of death listed for Indiana soldiers buried at the National Cemetery in Andersonville, Georgia, shows that diarrhea and scurvy directly accounted for at least two-thirds.[45] Dysentery was the side by side common cause of death, with the infamous diseases such as smallpox, typhus, pneumonia, and gangrene responsible for only a small fraction. Those who were killed in bodily battle or who died every bit a effect of their wounds deemed only for one percent of the total deaths.

Other big infectious killers such as carmine fever, measles, diphtheria, and whooping coughing (also known as pertussis) all greatly declined during this time to where they were either completely eliminated or considered mild childhood illnesses past the mid-1900s. This massive refuse of 99% of deaths in whooping cough and measles occurred earlier vaccines or antibiotics were available (Graph five & 6).

Graph 5: England and Wales whooping cough mortality charge per unit from 1838 to 1978.

Graph half-dozen: England and Wales measles mortality rate from 1838 to 1978.

The fairytale legend of a country doc making a discovery that saved the globe from the devastation of smallpox is a fundamental medical conventionalities that continues to be echoed by indoctrinated and naïve doctors whenever vaccines are challenged. Smallpox vaccine, in the minds of medical professionals remains a pillar of their vaccine faith. Just the truthful history shows the states a unlike reality.

The brand proper noun of vaccination was indoctrinated into the world psyche equally something to protect someone from an illness. This conventionalities spawned off numerous other ideas using the same notion of injecting whole or parts of disease matter into living beings in attempts to protect them from a specific disease. The reality of vaccination is nothing shut to the myth.

Other extremely effective alternative methods of sanitation, nutrition, apple cider vinegar, and other solutions were ignored and take since vanished from societal collective memory. Instead we were left with the mythical history of Jenner's great discovery and the continued onslaught of dangerous vaccines to newborn infants. Vaccines are now a regular thing from cradle to grave, all in the name of supposedly healthier people. Now that the curtain has been pulled dorsum on the origins of vaccination, practise more than and more vaccines seem similar a good thought to you lot?

More than information on the history of vaccination including polio, measles, whooping cough, and lost remedies can be found in Dr Humphries' and Roman Bystrianyk's book "Dissolving Illusions" which can exist found on amazon.com

Bibliography:
1.Seth Mnookin, The Panic Virus, Simon & Schuster, 2011, p. 31.
2.Science the Definitive Visual Guide, DK Publishing, 2009, p. 156.
3.Victor C. Vaughan, MD, Epidemiology and Public Wellness, St. Louis, C.5. Mosby Company, 1922, p. 189.
4.Frederick F. Cartwright, Disease and History, Rupert-Hart-Davis, London, 1972, p. 124.
five.William Douglass, MA, A Summary, Historical and Political, of the First Planting, Progressive Improvements and Present Land of the British Settlements of Northward-America, London, 1760, p. 398.
6.Ann Jannetta, The Vaccinators: Smallpox Medical Knowledge and the 'Opening' of Nihon, Stanford Academy Printing, 2007, p.179.
7."The Do of Inoculation Truly Stated," The Gentleman's Magazine and Historical Chronicle, vol. 34, 1764, p. 333.
viii.Dr. Walter Hadwen, The Instance Against Vaccination, Goddard's Rooms, Gloucester, January 25, 1896, p. 12.
9.Charles Creighton, Jenner and Vaccination, 1889, pp. 95-96.
x.William Scott Tebb, Doc, A Century of Vaccination and What it Teaches, Swan Sonnenschein & Co., London, 1898, p. 126.
11."Vaccination by Act of Parliament," Westminster Review, vol. 131, 1889, p. 101.
12."Observations on Prevailing Diseases," The London Medical Repository Monthly Journal and Review, vol. VIII, July-December, 1817, p. 95.
13.Mr. Thomas Dark-brown, Surgeon Musselburgh, "On the Nowadays State of Vaccination," The Edinburgh Medical and Surgical Journal, Book Fifteenth, 1819, p. 67.
14."Observations by Mr. Fosbroke," The Lancet, vol. II, 1829, p. 583.
15.William Cobbett, Communication to Young Men and (Incidentally) to Immature Women, 1829, London, pp. 224-225.
16.Dr. Delagrange of Paris, "On the Present State of Vaccination in France," The Lancet, vol. II, 1829, p. 582.
17."Cowpox Origin of," The Medico-chirurgical review and periodical of applied medicine, vol. 20, 1834, p. 504.
18.Dr. Fiard, "Experiments upon the Advice and Origin of Vaccine Virus," London medical and surgical journal, vol. 4, 1834, p. 796.
xix.Ephraim Cutter, MD, "Partial Report on the Production of Vaccine Virus in the U.s.a.," Transactions of the American Medical Clan, vol. XXIII, 1872, p. 200.
20.Encyclopaedia Britannica, vol. 24, Philadelphia, 1890, p. 25.
21.The Morning Chronicle, Wednesday, April 12, 1854.
22."Vaccination," New York Times, September 26, 1869.
23.Susan Wade Peabody, "Historical Study of Legislation Regarding Public Health in the Land of New York and Massachusetts," The Periodical of Infectious Diseases, Supplement no. 4, February 1909, p. 50-51.
24."Minor-pox and Revaccination," Boston Medical and Surgical Journal, vol. CIV, no. 6, February 10, 1881, p. 137.
25.Dr. Olesen, "Vaccination in the Philippine Islands," Medical Sentry, April 1911, vol. xix, no. 4, p. 255.
26."Vaccination," New York Times, September 26, 1869.
27.G. W. Harman, Md, "A Doctor'southward Statement Confronting the Efficacy of Virus Inoculation," Medical Cursory: A Monthly Periodical of Scientific Medicine and Surgery: vol. 28, no. 1, 1900, p. 84.
28.The Parliamentary Debates, vol. CCCXXVI, June 1, 1888, p. 933.
29."A Demonstration Against Vaccination," Boston Medical and Surgical Journal, April 16, 1885, p. 380.
30.J. W. Hodge, MD, "Prophylaxis to be Realized Through the Attainment of Health, Not past the Propagation of Disease," The St. Louis Medical and Surgical Periodical, vol. LXXXIII, July 1902, p. fifteen.
31.J. Due west. Hodge, Doc, "How Small-Pox was Banished from Leicester," Twentieth Century Magazine, vol. III, no. 16, Jan, 1911, p. 342.
32.Charles 5. Chapin, "Variation in Type of Infectious disease as Shown by the History of Smallpox in the United states," The Journal of Infectious Diseases, vol. 13, no. 2, September 1913, p. 173.
33.John Gerald Fitzgerald, Peter Gillespie, Harry Manufacturing plant Lancaster, An introduction to the practice of preventive medicine, C.V. Mosby Company, 1922, p. 197.
34.John Price Crozer Griffith, The diseases of infants and children, Book 1, W.B. Saunders Company, 1921, p. 370.
35.Audrey H. Reynolds MD and Howard A. Joos Dr., Exczema Vaccinatum, Pediatrics, August 1958, pp. 259-267
36.David Koplow, Smallpox: The Right to Eradicate a Global Scourge, 2004, University of California Press, p.21.
37.The Yale journal of biology and medicine, 1968, vol. 41, p. 10.
38.Maggie Fox, 2007, Toddler Survives Smallpox Vaccine Reaction, Reuters.
39.Dr. Charles Cyril Okell, "From a bacteriological dorsum-number," Lancet, January ane, 1938, pp. 48-49.
40."Acerb Acid in Scarlet Fever," American homoeopathist—A Monthly Journal of Medical Surgical and Sanitary Science, vol. 1, no. 1, July 1877, p. 73.
41."Vinegar to Prevent Smallpox," The Critique, January 15, 1899, p. 289.
42.Cleveland Journal of Medicine, vol. Vi, no. 1, 1901, p. 58.
43.William A. Guy, "Lectures on Public Health. Addressed to the Students of the Theological Department of Male monarch's College," Medical Times, vol. 23, January 4 to June 28, 1851, p. 283.
44.Roy Porter, The Greatest Benefit to Flesh, Harper Collins, New York, 1997, p. 399.
45.Report of the Unveiling And Dedication of Indiana Monument at Andersonville, Georgia (National Cemetery), November 26 1908, pp. 73-102.

Filed under: ADHD, Aspergers, autism, Child Health Prophylactic, MMR, vaccination, vaccine, vaccine court, Vaccine Impairment, Vaccines | Tagged: ADHD, Anti-vaccine Safety, Aspergers, autism, Cervarix, Gardasil, government, Health, HPV, HPV vaccine, medicine, mercury, MMR, politics, science, thimerosal, thiomersal, vaccination, vaccine, vaccine court, Vaccine Impairment, Vaccines |

montoyaimper1983.blogspot.com

Source: https://childhealthsafety.wordpress.com/2013/12/23/smallpox-eradication-one-of-historys-biggest-lies-how-vaccination-did-not-eradicate-smallpox/

Share this post